Thu 6/4/2020 03:15 ET
DJIA26269.89538.532.05%TELCO172.262.031.18%GOLD1731.6018.351.06%Shanghai2918.834.670.16%
S&P 5003122.8742.471.36%BANKS363.8119.035.23%OIL35.341.634.61%BITCOIN9666.2311.600.12%
NASDAQ9682.9175.530.78%PHARM614.141.350.22%US/EU1.120.000.23%Futures3057.2519.260.63%
Welcome Stranger!  Please sign up or log in to enable additional features.Sign Up | Mail | Log In
Forum - New Political Forum    Absolutely No Personal Attacks, NONE WHATSOEVER

Msg Top | Msg List | < Prev | Next > | Post New | Reply | Privately | Search
  
From: deaconmike (Rep: 958)Date: 10/22/2019 20:06
Forum: New Political Forum - Msg #11578Thread #674104465 (Rec: 0)
So, let me see if I got this straight,,, Taylor said someone told him it was

a quid pro quo,,,and he figured what was being said translated into it being
a quid pro quo,,,,
And then someone who actually questioned Taylor today said this,,,
Rep. Ratcliffe: "Ambassador Taylor again today I found him to be forthright. He had very
strong opinions on Donald Trump’s approach to foreign policy. But again the mainstream
media reporting that he provided evidence of a quid pro quo involving military aid is false.
I questioned him directly on that. Under Adam Schiff’s rules I can’t tell you what he said but
I can tell you what he didn’t say. Neither he or any other witness has provided testimony that
the Ukrainians were aware that military aide was being withheld. You can’t have a quid pro quo
with no quo."

Imo, they need to stop this circus,,take a vote & continue asap with a trial.
Where both sides can be present & ask questions,,,and subpoena witnesses

NOTE: This message has been revised 1 time. Read original version of this message.
What would you like to do? Message: Endorse | Bookmark | Report AbuseUser deaconmike: Reward | Watch | Ignore

Msg Top | Msg List | < Prev | Next > | Post New | Reply | Privately | Search
  

TheLion.com | About Us | Agreement & Disclaimer | Privacy | Twitter
© 1999- TheLion.com, Inc.