|Forum - New Political Forum
||Absolutely No Personal Attacks, NONE WHATSOEVER |
|From: deaconmike (Rep: 958)||Date: 10/22/2019 20:06|
|Forum: New Political Forum - Msg #11578||Thread #674104465 (Rec: 0) |
|So, let me see if I got this straight,,, Taylor said someone told him it was|
a quid pro quo,,,and he figured what was being said translated into it being
a quid pro quo,,,,
And then someone who actually questioned Taylor today said this,,,
Rep. Ratcliffe: "Ambassador Taylor again today I found him to be forthright. He had very
strong opinions on Donald Trump’s approach to foreign policy. But again the mainstream
media reporting that he provided evidence of a quid pro quo involving military aid is false.
I questioned him directly on that. Under Adam Schiff’s rules I can’t tell you what he said but
I can tell you what he didn’t say. Neither he or any other witness has provided testimony that
the Ukrainians were aware that military aide was being withheld. You can’t have a quid pro quo
with no quo."
Imo, they need to stop this circus,,take a vote & continue asap with a trial.
Where both sides can be present & ask questions,,,and subpoena witnesses
|NOTE: This message has been revised 1 time. Read original version of this message.|
TheLion.com | About Us | Agreement & Disclaimer | Privacy | Twitter
© 1999- TheLion.com, Inc.