Sat 12/7/2019 18:26 ET
DJIA28015.06341.781.22%TELCO191.610.690.36%GOLD1464.5518.601.27%Shanghai2899.970.580.02%
S&P 5003145.9128.630.91%BANKS506.337.701.52%OIL59.130.701.18%BITCOIN7589.4837.190.49%
NASDAQ8656.5386.571.00%PHARM595.773.040.51%US/EU1.110.000.00%Futures3146.3828.630.91%
Welcome Stranger!  Please sign up or log in to enable additional features.Sign Up | Mail | Log In
Forum - New Political Forum    Absolutely No Personal Attacks, NONE WHATSOEVER

Msg Top | Msg List | < Prev | Next > | Post New | Reply | Privately | Search
  
From: Faithalone (Rep: 62) reply to trendtnDate: 11/19/2019 10:26
Forum: New Political Forum - Msg #12097Thread #674108264 (Rec: 0)
Re: After reading all the comments from people posting on this board if anyon...

except in this case the Ukrainians had no idea the money was being withheld and the money was released without any quid pro quo. So there was no "attempted" murder as in your case.

Your case example would hold no water without the "attempted" murder and the "boss" would never be convicted on a bunch of criminals claiming they heard from someone else that he eluded to a hit that never occurred and the person that supposedly had the hit ordered on them comes out in defense of the "boss".

So no your example doesn't apply here at all.



Reply to trendtn - Msg #12093 - 11/19/2019 09:35

Re: After reading all the comments from people posting on this board if anyon...

A gang boss tells a gang member to kill someone over the phone

He tries fails and is arrested.

He says the boss ordered him to do it.
Other come forward and say they heard the order.

In you view the boss cannot be convicted on that evidence?
Really?
In what court.
Defendants are convicted everyday on much much less
What would you like to do? Message: Endorse | Bookmark | Report AbuseUser Faithalone: Reward | Watch | Ignore

Msg Top | Msg List | < Prev | Next > | Post New | Reply | Privately | Search
  

TheLion.com | About Us | Agreement & Disclaimer | Privacy | Twitter
© 1999- TheLion.com, Inc.